<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: American Airlines Charges To Check Luggage</title> <atom:link href="http://amateurtraveler.com/2008/06/10/american-airlines-charges-to-check-luggage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://amateurtraveler.com/2008/06/10/american-airlines-charges-to-check-luggage/</link> <description>The Amateur Traveler focuses on the best places to travel to. It covers everything from road trips to swimming with whales in Tonga. It includes both a weekly audio podcast, twice monthly video podcast and a blog.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 03:09:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Kirk Crawford</title><link>http://amateurtraveler.com/2008/06/10/american-airlines-charges-to-check-luggage/comment-page-1/#comment-141873</link> <dc:creator>Kirk Crawford</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:44:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://amateurtraveler.com/?p=1151#comment-141873</guid> <description>My company just announced a policy change in accordance with these new baggage charges.  They will reimburse us for the first checked bag, but will only reimburse use for the second bag fee or oversize/overweight fees if we can justify that it is required for &quot;Company Business Purposes&quot;.  I guess Ill have to start packing less stuff.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My company just announced a policy change in accordance with these new baggage charges.  They will reimburse us for the first checked bag, but will only reimburse use for the second bag fee or oversize/overweight fees if we can justify that it is required for &#8220;Company Business Purposes&#8221;.  I guess Ill have to start packing less stuff.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wes</title><link>http://amateurtraveler.com/2008/06/10/american-airlines-charges-to-check-luggage/comment-page-1/#comment-141872</link> <dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:29:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://amateurtraveler.com/?p=1151#comment-141872</guid> <description>United &amp; US Airways just added the policies this morning.  I certainly step clear when possible of the companies implementing these over-the-top policies.  When is it going to become clear to them that Southwest is working (no baggage fees, no cancellation fees) and the others are not?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>United &amp; US Airways just added the policies this morning.  I certainly step clear when possible of the companies implementing these over-the-top policies.  When is it going to become clear to them that Southwest is working (no baggage fees, no cancellation fees) and the others are not?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 29/33 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 408/409 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via N/A (user agent is rejected)

Served from: amateurtraveler.com @ 2012-05-21 03:53:11 -->
